Thank you for your letter regarding US foreign assistance. I welcome your support for continued US engagement in the Middle East. However, as a retired Foreign Service officer, I am more concerned with the State Department’s operations
budget than the foreign assistance budget
I think that lack of funds or uncertainty about funds was a major consideration in State’s decision not to provide more security to the consulate in Benghazi, resulting
in the death of Ambassador Stevens. The whole mess with the US budget and the “fiscal cliff” was a major factor leading to his death. In all the investigations into his death and all the finger pointing, some of those fingers should point at Congress
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Tuesday, October 09, 2012
Cheers for Angela Merkel
While the US is deciding whether Obama or Romney would be the best American leader for the next four years, I'd like to give a shout-out to someone who has served their country well for years -- Angela Merkel of Germany. Today Germany is the strongman of Europe. Merkel is taking a lot of criticism for how she is handling the Euro crisis, including today as she visits Greece, according to the NYT. On the other hand, she gets criticized at home for being too lenient in handing out German cash to the poor countries of Europe. She has become one of the most important politicians on the world stage, eclipsing to some extent Obama, Cameron, Hollande, even Putin and the Chinese. She has helped make Germany prosperous at home in difficult circumstances. Germany probably been the most exemplary country showing that it is possible to have good wages and full employment in a globally competitive world. Good for her.
Obama and the Bubble
Many of the commentators have been saying that the reason Obama did so poorly in the debate with Romney was that he has spent four years in the White House bubble, where everyone is a yes-man afraid to confront him. This overlooks the fact that Obama meets with foreign leaders who are not afraid to talk back to him, to demand things from him, to say that he is wrong. However, it was not a good sign when Obama refused to meet with any foreign leaders during the UN general assembly. Did he know that he was not up to it?
We usually don't see what actually happens when Obama meets with foreign leaders. There are usually only a few high level aides present. We got a glimpse when Obama and Netanyahu sparred during a photo session at the While House about a year ago. The consensus seemed to be the Netanyahu took Obama to the woodshed. That may be one reason Obama did not want to meet with Netanyahu again just before the debate.
We don't know how Obama does in bilateral meetings with foreign leaders, but we know that the has them. He may let Hillary Clinton take the lead. But in any case he does not live inside the "no-drama" Obama bubble all the time.
We usually don't see what actually happens when Obama meets with foreign leaders. There are usually only a few high level aides present. We got a glimpse when Obama and Netanyahu sparred during a photo session at the While House about a year ago. The consensus seemed to be the Netanyahu took Obama to the woodshed. That may be one reason Obama did not want to meet with Netanyahu again just before the debate.
We don't know how Obama does in bilateral meetings with foreign leaders, but we know that the has them. He may let Hillary Clinton take the lead. But in any case he does not live inside the "no-drama" Obama bubble all the time.
MTCR Terms Changed for South Korea
The reports that South Korea has been granted special permission to build missiles that exceed the guidelines of the Missile Technology Control Regime are confusing. Reports in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal said that South Korea and the US had agreed to extend the range of missiles that South Korea would build. However, the MTCR is not an arms control treaty that limits the range of South Korean missiles; it is a suppliers agreement that limits the US and other members, who agree not to supply Korea with missiles or technology or parts for missiles beyond the agreed range. Thus, it appears that the violator of the MTCR is the United States, not Korea.
I assume that the US has gotten the agreement of the other 33 supplier-country members of the MTCR to this extension of range and payload. It should not be a bilateral decision when the US is a member of a suppliers' group.
I assume that the US has gotten the agreement of the other 33 supplier-country members of the MTCR to this extension of range and payload. It should not be a bilateral decision when the US is a member of a suppliers' group.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)