This Wall
Street Journal article discusses the intraparty dispute that has broker out
within both the Republican and Democratic parties over the role of “regime
change” in US foreign policy. Against
regime change are Republicans Donald Trump, Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, joined by
Democrat Bernie Sanders. Hillary Clinton
is for regime change, since she oversaw it in Egypt and Libya, although she
says she argued for more gradual change in Egypt but was overruled by others in
the Obama administration. Her
interventionism is echoed by Marco Rubio.
I am disappointed that the US has become “assassination
nation,” beginning perhaps after World War II when the CIA was formed. But it was relatively rare until the Bush and
Obama administrations. Bush just liked
killing Muslims, mainly in Iraq and Afghanistan. With drones Obama now can kill anybody
anywhere, and he often does.
Assassination by drone is probably better than the old fashioned way
which often involved many collateral casualties, even in the case of bin
Laden.
For me, however, it goes against the standard set by leading
men in the old Western movies, who did not shoot their enemies in the
back. Attacking individuals secretly
from the sky seems cowardly, even if it may be good for American security. You can argue that terrorists have no right
to any kind of fair treatment, but when the US abandons fairness and justice,
it sets a bad example for the rest of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment