The Founding Fathers were not
enthusiastic about pure democracy. In his
excellent book, The Quartet, historian Joseph Ellis describes James Madison’s
views on a democracy that represented the direct choices of “the people.”
“Madison’s experience at both the state
and the federal level had convinced him that “the people” was not some
benevolent, harmonious collective but rather a smoldering and ever-shifting
gathering of factions or interest groups committed to provincial perspectives
and vulnerable to demagogues with partisan agendas. The question, then, was how
to reconcile the creedal conviction about popular sovereignty with the highly
combustible, inherently swoonish character of democracy. Perhaps the most
succinct way to put the question was this: How could a republic bottomed on the
principle of popular sovereignty be structured in such a way to manage the
inevitable excesses of democracy and best serve the long-term public interest?
“Madison’s one-word answer was
“filtration.” He probably got the idea from David Hume’s Idea of a Perfect
Commonwealth (1754), an uncharacteristically utopian essay in which Hume
imagined how to construct the ideal republican government from scratch.
Ordinary voters would elect local representatives, who would elect the next
tier of representatives, and so on up the political ladder in a process of
refinement that left the leaders at the top connected only distantly with the
original electorate and therefore free to make decisions that might be
unpopular. A republic under this filtration scheme was a political framework
with a democratic base and a hierarchical superstructure that allowed what
Madison described as “the purest and noblest characters” to function as public
servants rather than popular politicians.”
Originally
there was no direct election of Senators, and Presidents were (and are) elected
by the electoral college. In 1913 the 17th
Amendment changed the process to allow for direct election of Senators. Prior to the 17th Amendment, Senators
were elected by state legislatures. Madison’s
idea was that there would be different levels of voting. “The people” would vote for the lowest level of
legislators, hopefully electing the highest quality men (no women) that they
knew. That level would elect the next
level, again hopefully electing the best people they knew, and so on. Political parties and the primary system have
perverted the system the founders envisaged.
The electoral college still exists, but in today’s world, few people
know the candidates running to be members of the electoral college. In general, they are party hacks, not
outstanding members of the community as the founders intended.
The Constitution
gave to the states the right to determine who could vote in elections. Most states originally limited the right to
vote to property-owning or tax-paying white males. Over the years, more and more classes of
people have been granted the right to vote, so that elections are now pretty
much the voice of “the people, ” which Madison feared would lead to the
election of demagogues and other poor leaders.
No comments:
Post a Comment