I do not often disagree with Fareed Zakaria, but this week I disagree with both his Washington Post column and his CNN GPS commentary.
In his Washington
Post column, Fareed Zakaria says he does not believe that the Chinese and
Russian tests of a hypersonic missile is a Sputnik moment. Gen. Milley did not say that the Chinese test
was a Sputnik moment, but was close to it.
Fareed says:
“Sputnik was a revolution in the space race.
Hypersonic missiles, on the other hand, are old news. A hypersonic missile
travels at five times the
speed of sound or faster. Starting in 1959, the United States and the Soviet
Union have deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles that travel more
than 20 times the speed of sound.”
If hypersonic missile technology is so
unimportant, why are the US, China, and Russia
working on it. It may not be a strategic
game changer, but it does show where each country stands in terms of developing
new weapons technology. A hypersonic
missile could be a precursor of a hypersonic plane, civilian or military. Or it might be a useless white elephant like “Star
Wars” anti-ballistic missile technology has been so far. Military technology, whether for “Star Wars”
or hypersonic missiles, does give some insight into a country’s defense
capabilities, even if it is not immediately implemented in deployed weapons.
The hypersonic competition shows that there is
some kind of cold war among the big three countries, even if it is different
from the old cold war between the US and Russia. I think hypersonic missiles are more important
than Fareed thinks they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment